Showthesources

A claim from a reel

“Mindfulness worked as well as an antidepressant for anxiety, with far fewer side effects.”

1Mindfulness here means an 8-week MBSR course: 2.5 hours a week, plus 45 minutes of practice a day. The drug was escitalopram, sold as Lexapro, at 10–20 mg.

2Noninferior, which is not the same as better: severity fell 1.35 points on the course, 1.43 on the drug. Side effects: 15.4% against 78.6%. JAMA Psychiatry, 2023

✅ Truedeep check · both sources open below
Move the light across the claimEvery verdict comes with its sources

Fact-checking, in your DMs

Confident is not the same as true.

You just did by hand what the bot does in a few minutes. Forward any reel and the claim, the verdict and the sources come back in the chat. Every check stays in an archive you can search later.

Free credits to start, and there is nothing to install

▶ forwarded reel“Mindfulness worked as well as an antidepressant for anxiety, with far fewer side effects.”
⏳ Got it. I’m analyzing the whole material. The exact charge will appear with the result.
✅ TrueThe numbers check out. TAME trial, JAMA Psychiatry 2023: 276 adults with anxiety disorders randomised, 208 finished. The 8-week mindfulness course came out noninferior to escitalopram at 10–20 mg: severity fell 1.35 points on the course and 1.43 on the drug, a difference of 0.07 either way. Study-related side effects: 78.6% on the drug, 15.4% on the course. Noninferior means not worse. It does not mean better.

An example of a check, with the sources it actually rests on.

Forward it.
Read the sources.

01

Forward a reel, a post or a link from Instagram or Telegram.

02

The bot reads the whole video, both what is said out loud and what is written on screen, then pulls out the factual claims.

03

The verdict comes back with its sources. Open them yourself: that is the point of the thing.

04

Closing the chat does not lose it. The check is written down, and you can ask about it later.

Where we look

The same story, told three ways

A deep check searches in the language the material was made in, in English, and in the language of the country where the events happened. The same event gets reported differently in each.

01

The language of the material

what the people who made it read

02

English

the widest published record

03

The language of the country

where the event actually happened

Mixed

When the zones contradict each other on the substance of a fact, we don’t quietly pick the convenient one. The verdict says Mixed, both versions go in the card, and the language of every source is named.

In your language

Ask in yours. Read the answer in yours.

Searching and answering are separate things. The interface is translated into sixteen languages, down to the buttons, and the answers are not limited to those.

English中文हिन्दीEspañolالعربيةFrançaisPortuguêsРусскийবাংলাاردوBahasa IndonesiaDeutsch日本語Türkçe한국어Tiếng Việt+ any other, just say which
Auto

Say nothing and the check answers in the language of the material. Ask for Kazakh, Farsi or Brazilian Portuguese in your own words and it answers that way from then on, including languages where nobody has translated the buttons.

Four honest answers

True

The central claims hold up against the sources found.

Mixed

Part holds up and part does not, or credible sources genuinely disagree. The card carries both versions.

False

The central claims contradict the sources found, and the card says which ones.

Nothing to check

Opinion, satire, personal experience. The bot says so instead of inventing a verdict.

What stays

A memory you can search

Every check is written down the moment it finishes: the verdict, the reasoning, the sources, the caption, and whatever you wrote next to it. Saved reels pile up somewhere you never open again. These you can search, and ask about, months later.

Mindfulness vs escitalopram

✅ True

The numbers check out. TAME trial, JAMA Psychiatry 2023: 276 adults with anxiety disorders randomised, 208 finished. The 8-week mindfulness course came out noninferior to escitalopram at 10–20 mg: severity fell 1.35 points on the course and 1.43 on the drug, a difference of 0.07 either way. Study-related side effects: 78.6% on the drug, 15.4% on the course. Noninferior means not worse. It does not mean better.

#health#mindfulness#instagram

One entry, as you find it when you come back. It is yours, and one message deletes it, even when your balance is empty.

Ask it in words

“what did I check about mindfulness?”

Or ask for a topic

Ask for everything that turned out false, for one subject, or for the last few checks — in your own words, in the chat.

Entries link to each other by the people and concepts inside them, so related checks stay connected instead of sitting in a flat list.

Why a verdict here is worth something

Independent

The people who use it pay for it. There are no ads and no sponsors, we do not sell data, and nobody can order a verdict or order one changed.

Dated

Facts age. Every card carries the date it was checked, and a stale verdict is checked again rather than repeated.

Correctable

Models run the checks, not editors, so a check can be wrong. Send one back and we review it again against current sources — how that works.

Credits, two ways

Credits pay for actual AI usage. Basic is usually about 0.3 credit. Deep is never more than 20 credits. The exact charge appears with the result. The prices themselves live on the pricing page, in your currency.

MonthlyA credit quota that resets every monthUnused quota expires with the monthCancel any time and the paid month stays yours
One-off packA single payment, no renewalsThese credits never expireSpent only after the monthly quota runs out
See prices →

Buying happens in the chat: the payment page is personal, so its link arrives there.

There will be another confident video today.

Send it here before you repeat it. You start with six credits.

Send a reel on Instagram